Do you need the caller's consent to record business calls?

Summary

Under federal law, one party's consent is enough, and that party can be you. Some states demand more: Washington and Florida both require the consent of everyone on the call, and in Florida an unlawful recording is generally a third-degree felony. Washington's statute treats a clear announcement at the start of the call as consent from everyone, and RingCentral and Zoom Phone can both play one; Zoom can also ask callers to press 1 to consent.

What the statutes say

The federal wiretap statute, 18 U.S.C. §2511(2)(d), makes it lawful to record a call you are part of, or one where a party has given prior consent, unless the recording is made to commit a crime or a tort.

Washington's RCW 9.73.030 bars recording a private phone conversation without first getting the consent of all participants. It also says how consent can be obtained: one party announces to everyone, in a reasonably effective way, that the call is about to be recorded, and if the call is recorded, the announcement has to be on the recording too. Calls reporting an emergency or carrying threats can be recorded with one party's consent.

Florida's section 934.03 makes interception lawful when all parties have given prior consent. Violations are generally a third-degree felony.

Which state's law governs a call between two states isn't settled by the text of these statutes. This is a summary of statutes, not legal advice.

How the big platforms handle announcements and storage

Teams meeting recordings expire after 120 days by default, but Microsoft scopes that policy to meetings and events and doesn't say it covers call recordings.

Sources

Related on this site


Written by Kaz (pen name). Figures are copied from providers' published pricing pages on the dates shown. We have not used these products. Corrections: contact form.